Cricket still in the dark ages
Floodlit cricket – something that seems almost ancient in the modern game what with pink balls, Twenty20 and the influx Sir Allen Stanford’s cash cabinet – appears to be another thing the authorities cannot get right. Last night’s 40-over game between Kent and Leicestershire was abandoned because four floodlight pylons couldn’t be erected high enough in the windy weather, leaving players and fans understandably angry and frustrated.
Thousands trekked to the St Lawrence Ground for Kent’s only floodlit game of this season despite the presence of Sky and the temptation to avoid the autumnal weather. But instead of lights, cameras and action the crowd were treated to a farce – come 8.30 the only action at the ground was in the Sky studio, perched 15 foot up and suffering no ill-effects from the blustery conditions.
Leicestershire reached 23-2 in reply to Kent’s 40-over total of 226-7 before the natural light faded, and the players walked off. The umpires left the carrot dangling, revealing play might be possible if the wind was to die down and many ended up giving up. But this should have been sorted earlier.
Cricket is an entertainment business. The players are there to earn their wages by entertaining the crowds, who pay to be entertained but too often now we see this simple notion ignored by the powers that be. Instead of simply starting the game earlier, or agreeing to a shortened game (say 25 overs per side), the game petered out to a no result. Do the fans get reimbursed for their troubles?
Sky has a little too much influence on our cricket – starting earlier would have caused problems with their television schedule, and so this simple solution couldn’t be used. Floodlit cricket has been in this country long enough for any problems to be sorted – with only two years before the English Premier League’s inauguration, let’s hope the organisation of this important tournament will be a little less chaotic.
